Most Popular Stories
- Top FAA execs lack institutional knowledge, says official; agency must be prepared for cuts
- Air traffic control training gaps will be exacerbated by NextGen, says OIG
- Agencies plan for governmentwide FOIA portal
- FAA reauthorization would create NextGen czar UPDATED
- Obama administration announces immigrant visa waiver change
Events
- IBM Global Business Services Career Expo
February 16, 2012 — Huntsville, AL 11am - 8pm - IBM Global Business Services Career Expo
February 16, 2012 — Linthicum Heights, MD 10am - 3pm - Learn With Your Peers at the Federal Senior Management Conference
April 15-18 — Cambridge, MD - V2X for Auto Safety and Mobility USA 2012
March 20-21, 2012 — Novi, MI
Sponsored Links
HOT TOPICS >> Cloud computing | Cybersecurity | Gov 2.0 | Fiscal 2012 | Mobile | Transparency | GAO reports
AGENCY NEWS >> Defense | NASA | Homeland Security | NIST | OMB | Veterans Affairs | NARA | GSA
Latest News
Free Newsletter
About | View Sample | Privacy
Popular Topics
Whitepapers
- Virtual Game Changer
- The Data Center in Your Future
- End-of-life solution management for mobile devices reduces MNCs' security, compliance and sustainability risks
- The E-discovery Toolbox: What you should look for in a unified e-discovery solution
- Efficiency On Demand
- Cloud Computing: Threat or opportunity for VARs and MSPs? Special focus on cloud collaboration and messaging
Pentagon's cybercommand plans stall
The Pentagon is finding out that even the best cybersecurity plans get hung up over bureaucracy and congressional worries about issues such as privacy. That's the case with Department of Defense's plan to set up a command to defend its global network of computer systems. Congress is questioning its mission and possible privacy issues. As a result, the Oct. 1, 2009 target launch date was delayed, and there's no date for a confirmation hearing for the command's first director.
It's another hurdle in the long road toward getting an essential idea off the ground, according to experts who have been charting the course of the Pentagon's cybercommand initiative. The idea is an effort to consolidate existing offensive and defensive capabilities under one roof and involves no new authorities or broadening of mission.
But there are policy issues that still must be resolved, including: How far can the Pentagon go to defend its own networks? And what kind of relationship will the command have to the National Security Agency?
"I don't think there's any dispute about the need for Cyber Command," Paul B. Kurtz, a cybersecurity expert who served in the George W. Bush and Clinton administrations., told the Washington Post. "We need to do better defending DOD networks and more clearly think through what we're going to do offensively in cyberspace. But the question is how does that all mesh with existing organizations and authorities? The devil really is in the details."
A better cybersecurity operation is at the front-and-center of the Obama administration's plans to deal with the growing cyberwarfare threat The plan also calls for strengthening "intelligence sensing," or the blocking of malicious software and codes entering military networks, officials said.
"Our goal here is to better protect our forces," Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Robert J. Butler said. "If someone can intrude inside the network, it could impair our ability to communicate and operate."
For more on this story:
- see this Washington Post article
Related Articles:
Pentagon to get a handle on cyberwarfare
Obama's cybersecurity strategy
Time for public debate on cyberwarfare policies
Related Stories
- That new war: The digital one
- DoD launches blog for 2.0 ideas
- DHS seeks synergy with DoD, private sector
- Army contractor cited for lax computer security
- DoD cybercommand stalled
- Pentagon to get a handle on cyber warfare
- White House plans new cybermilitary command
- Does the Pentagon need a cyberwarfare service?
- Survey: Federal IT skeptical of cloud computing benefits
- Panel: Even the best cyber legislation won't fix security problems
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site Map
| EditorsTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceEnergy | FierceSmartGrid | FierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceComplianceIT | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceMobileHealthcare | FierceHealthPayer | FiercePracticeManagement | FierceEMR | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceGovernmentIT | FierceGovernment | FierceHomelandSecurity | FierceBiotech | FierceBiotech Research | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceBiotechIT | FiercePharma Manufacturing | FierceMedicalDevices | FierceDrugDelivery | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceEnterpriseCommunications | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe | FierceCable© 2011 FierceMarkets. All rights reserved. |
![]() |


